(3.8%)
[If this post had a subtitle, it would be, "I can't quit you, you Internets."]
OMG! OMG! OMG! OMG! OMG! OMG!
The economy shrunk 3.8% in the last quarter, the worst since 1982!!
[...]
Wait a second... 1982? Don't get me wrong, that was a bad quarter we had, and as someone in sales, it has affected me personally. But 1982, in the great scheme of things, is not that long ago. The 3.8% drop is actually considered much better than what some economists feared, a drop of over 5%. For all of 2008 the GDP actually rose by a paltry, but still positive, 1.3 percent.
The sky is not falling. Repeat, the sky is not falling.
Concerning 1982, while it wasn't exactly the best year economically, neither was it the stuff of lore. You don't see grandma and grandpa in their rocking chairs, gathering the children together, telling the tales of those great trials and tribulations, those breadlines and joblines, of that annum horribilis -- 1982.
Heck, by 1984, things were so much better that President Reagan was using "Morning in America" to wipeout Walter Mondale in a manner that puts Obama's win over McCain -- while solid -- in a bit of perspective.
Looking at the $819 billion dollar "stimulus" (yes, I'm using irony quotes) it seems more like a cure worse than the disease. Democrats have been out of power for a while, and this $819 billion seems more like a spending spree, a celebratory "We're back and we got money" moment. A bunch of Carrie Bradshaws, shopping for designer shoes on the taxpayers dime.
As Rahm Emmanuel said, "Never let a serious crisis go to waste."
Unfortunately, the Republicans during the first six years of the Bush administration didn't see an appropriation they didn't like, and lost a lot of the credibility they held as the party of financial responsibility. However, that is a credibility Democrats never held, and the American people may be remembering that. The poll numbers supporting the stimulus have been dropping steadily.
And more importantly, the non-partisan and highly respected Congressional Budget Office has determined that the overwhelming majority of the $819 billion won't even be spent in the next two years, and that speeding up that spending would be impractical and reckless.
To add upon that, the Buy American clause within the stimulus, while sounding good and patriotic, may in fact lead to a trade war between the US and our trading partners, Europe and China chief among them.
Trade wars and tariffs during an economic downturn? Go and google "Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act." I dare you. And did you notice the year that act was passed? 1930. Now that was an annum horribilis!
I could go on, but you get the point.
Times are not good. They are, in fact, bad. But they're not horrible. They are not wretched. They are highly precedented and common. They do not require a rushed through, pork-laden stimulus that reeks more of political back scratching. The $819 billion stimulus will pass. The Democratic votes are there for it, no matter what the Republicans do.
But that means the Democrats own it.
When the economy recovers -- in six months, nine, at worst twelve, it always does -- people will look back and wonder, "Was that $819 billion (a whole helluva lot of money) really necessary?" And by that time, it will have been after the fact gone over with a fine tooth comb. What is rushed through today may be an embarrasement tomorrow.
So why can't the stimulus be gone over before then? If all of that money, according to the CBO, cannot be spent wisely within two years anyway...
Why spend it in the first place?
OMG! OMG! OMG! OMG! OMG! OMG!
The economy shrunk 3.8% in the last quarter, the worst since 1982!!
[...]
Wait a second... 1982? Don't get me wrong, that was a bad quarter we had, and as someone in sales, it has affected me personally. But 1982, in the great scheme of things, is not that long ago. The 3.8% drop is actually considered much better than what some economists feared, a drop of over 5%. For all of 2008 the GDP actually rose by a paltry, but still positive, 1.3 percent.
The sky is not falling. Repeat, the sky is not falling.
Concerning 1982, while it wasn't exactly the best year economically, neither was it the stuff of lore. You don't see grandma and grandpa in their rocking chairs, gathering the children together, telling the tales of those great trials and tribulations, those breadlines and joblines, of that annum horribilis -- 1982.
Heck, by 1984, things were so much better that President Reagan was using "Morning in America" to wipeout Walter Mondale in a manner that puts Obama's win over McCain -- while solid -- in a bit of perspective.
Looking at the $819 billion dollar "stimulus" (yes, I'm using irony quotes) it seems more like a cure worse than the disease. Democrats have been out of power for a while, and this $819 billion seems more like a spending spree, a celebratory "We're back and we got money" moment. A bunch of Carrie Bradshaws, shopping for designer shoes on the taxpayers dime.
As Rahm Emmanuel said, "Never let a serious crisis go to waste."
Unfortunately, the Republicans during the first six years of the Bush administration didn't see an appropriation they didn't like, and lost a lot of the credibility they held as the party of financial responsibility. However, that is a credibility Democrats never held, and the American people may be remembering that. The poll numbers supporting the stimulus have been dropping steadily.
And more importantly, the non-partisan and highly respected Congressional Budget Office has determined that the overwhelming majority of the $819 billion won't even be spent in the next two years, and that speeding up that spending would be impractical and reckless.
To add upon that, the Buy American clause within the stimulus, while sounding good and patriotic, may in fact lead to a trade war between the US and our trading partners, Europe and China chief among them.
Trade wars and tariffs during an economic downturn? Go and google "Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act." I dare you. And did you notice the year that act was passed? 1930. Now that was an annum horribilis!
I could go on, but you get the point.
Times are not good. They are, in fact, bad. But they're not horrible. They are not wretched. They are highly precedented and common. They do not require a rushed through, pork-laden stimulus that reeks more of political back scratching. The $819 billion stimulus will pass. The Democratic votes are there for it, no matter what the Republicans do.
But that means the Democrats own it.
When the economy recovers -- in six months, nine, at worst twelve, it always does -- people will look back and wonder, "Was that $819 billion (a whole helluva lot of money) really necessary?" And by that time, it will have been after the fact gone over with a fine tooth comb. What is rushed through today may be an embarrasement tomorrow.
So why can't the stimulus be gone over before then? If all of that money, according to the CBO, cannot be spent wisely within two years anyway...
Why spend it in the first place?

