The Group That Shall Not Be Named
Gotta love it when liberals use legal thug tactics.
For the whole story go here, but here's a caption on a new T-shirt being made.
This T-shirt banned by: A left leaning political fundraising organization. We're amused that this group which paid $$$ for ads to demean one man is threatened by a $15 buck t-shirt that disagrees with their tactics. Henceforth, this organization shall be referred to as "the group that shall not be named."
Not the best grammar, but it does get the point across clear enough. A gross example of legal bullying by one of those groups who "claims" to be for the little guy.
For the whole story go here, but here's a caption on a new T-shirt being made.
This T-shirt banned by: A left leaning political fundraising organization. We're amused that this group which paid $$$ for ads to demean one man is threatened by a $15 buck t-shirt that disagrees with their tactics. Henceforth, this organization shall be referred to as "the group that shall not be named."
Not the best grammar, but it does get the point across clear enough. A gross example of legal bullying by one of those groups who "claims" to be for the little guy.
posted by Lee | 12:46 AM
3 Comments:
I don't really care to much about the intellectual property squabbling of groups on the left and the right that goes on constantly (though I admit when Exodus International tried, unsuccessfully, to sue a blogger for taking a photo of one of their billboards and photoshopping it to be pro-gay instead of anti-gay, I did post his image on my site).
The greatest part of the article you linked to is the fact that it was Rush Limbaugh who came up with the "Betrayus" line. I somehow missed all the GOP outrage when he said it I guess...
He had said it in reference to Senator Hagel. I'm not a big fan of name calling in general, but questioning the motives of a US Senator for political purposes, as opposed to a military man commanded to lead troops into harms way for political purposes, are two totally different things.
I'm not sure the're so different, nor am I so sure that I classify Gen. Petraus as "a military man commanded to lead troops into harms way." He hold rank in the military but it's not like he's out on a horse leading troops into battle. He sits behind the scenes yakking it up with the White House. He's as much a political figure in this as anything else.
Post a Comment
<< Home